Everybody Now Knows: Nobody Knows Anybody
“But my experience is that personal philosophies have a shelf life of about two weeks. Things’ll change.”
-Jerry Levov in American Pastoral by Philip Roth.
Is it possible to really know a person? To thoroughly understand any individual, with all those unknown or ignored intentions, motives, consequences and meanings that govern the surprising irregularity of human affairs? I have always wanted to believe that “of course I’m right about (insert-name-of-person-I’ve-known-intimately-for-years)” and that the best of friends or most devoutly impassioned soul mates are brought into existence by achieving this.
However, upon consideration it becomes impossible to deny that the amount of all that is unknown about people- including yourself!- is astonishing. Even more stunning is the importance placed on getting people right and what’s accepted as “knowing.”
Do I contradict myself?
Very well then I contradict myself,
(I am large, I contain multitudes.)
-Song of Myself by Walt Whitman
I, for one, contradict myself accidentally or with thoughtful purpose on average thrice a week. These contradictions range from trivial (like my refusal to eat fish due to its distasteful “fishiness” for years followed by a swift change in my taste buds’ preference), to more significant, usually due to the expiration of a personal philosophy that Jerry Levov insightfully identifies above. This freedom to change as required or pleased is one I admire and even respect for all humans, but is also an insurmountable obstacle to really getting to know one another. As are the countless details and circumstances that everyone’s life individually contains.
When faced with this knowledge it seems obvious enough that thinking you totally get your closest friends, that-Celebrity-you-hate, your romantic partner, your Mom/Dad/Sibling/Roommate/etc. is ridiculous, unfounded, and futile. But don’t we nearly daily find ourselves jumping to those satisfying assumptions in order to become content with our “correct” judgement of others as reality? That leap, so easily made thanks to the net of self-made, perception-affirming conclusions appearing to catch us?
It’s so damn easy to roll through life with a closed mind because that’s the automatic setting. Nobody wants to constantly remember how wrong they are, that sucks. So the obvious solution is to approach this significant business of getting other people right without any shallowness or superficiality or unreal expectations or intimidating presumptions. And despite the open mind, the approach of humble equality, we’ll never fail to get each other wrong- before and in anticipation of the meeting, while the exchange is taking place, and later in recalling the interaction- because we are simply not built to envision each other’s invisible goals or internal processes.
This is okay with me. Since acknowledging the impossibility of ever being completely right about the often wonderful people in my life my optimism and idealism have achieved greater (and likely more annoying) levels, and I’ve found myself equipped with more patience with, acceptance of, and less negativity directed towards other people.
“Getting people right is not what living is about anyway. It’s getting them wrong and wrong and wrong and then, on careful reconsideration, wrong again. That’s how we know we are alive: we’re wrong. Maybe the best thing would be to forget being right or wrong about people and just go along for the ride. But if you can do that- well, lucky you.”
The above quote, also from American Pastoral, summarizes this idea wonderfully. It’s just another one of life’s little difficulties brought around by this whole being human thing, and if we can CTFO then lucky us indeed.